Pii: S0010-0277(00)00114-1

A conversational implicature is an inference that consists of attributing to a speaker an implicit meaning that goes beyond the explicit linguistic meaning of an utterance. This paper experimentally investigates scalar implicature, a paradigmatic case of implicature in which a speaker's use of a term like Some indicates that the speaker had reasons not to use a more informative term from the same scale, e.g. All; thus, Some implicates Not all. Pragmatic theorists like Grice would predict that a pragmatic interpretation is determined only after its explicit, logical meaning is incorporated (e.g. where Some means at least one). The present work aims to developmentally examine this prediction by showing how younger, albeit competent, reasoners initially treat a relatively weak term logically before becoming aware of its pragmatic potential. Three experiments are presented. Experiment 1 presents a modal reasoning scenario offering an exhaustive set of conclusions; critical among these is participants' evaluation of a statement expressing Might be x when the context indicates that the stronger Must be x is true. The conversationally-infelicitous Might be x can be understood logically (e.g. as compatible with Must) or pragmatically (as exclusive to Must). Results from 5-, 7-, and 9-year-olds as well as adults revealed that (a) 7-year-olds are the youngest to demonstrate modal competence overall and that (b) 7and 9-year-olds treat the infelicitous Might logically signi®cantly more often than adults do. Experiment 2 showed how training with the modal task can suspend the implicatures for adults. Experiment 3 provides converging evidence of the developmental pragmatic effect with the French existential quanti®er Certains (Some). While linguistically-sophisticated children (8and 10year-olds olds) typically treat Certains as compatible with Tous (All), adults are equivocal. These results, which are consistent with unanticipated ®ndings in classic developmental papers, reveal a consistent ordering in which representations of weak scalar terms tend to be treated logically by young competent participants and more pragmatically by older ones. This work is also relevant to the treatment of scalar implicatures in the reasoning literature. q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. I.A. Noveck / Cognition 78 (2001) 165±188 165 Cognition 78 (2001) 165±188 www.elsevier.com/locate/cognit 0010-0277/01/$ see front matter q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S0010-0277(00)00114-1 COGN I T I O N * Institut des Sciences Cognitives, 67 Boulevard Pinel, 69675 Bron, France. Fax: 133-437-911-210. E-mail address: [email protected] (I.A. Noveck).